Source https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2024/06/is-70-the-new-60/
The interesting data in this open access preprint paper is a concrete example of the prevailing trend in human life expectancy. A slow, steady increase in life expectancy (both at birth and remaining life expectancy at middle age) has been underway for decades, driven in part by improvements in approaches to treating age-related disease. To a first approximation, these population-wide effects on the underlying processes of aging achieved over past decades have been unintentional side-effects of progress in medical science. Deliberate targeting of the mechanisms of aging is still a comparatively new idea, and too few people are making use of approaches that may have some benefit to noticeably affect the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiol…
Source https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2024/06/is-70-the-new-60/
The interesting data in this open access preprint paper is a concrete example of the prevailing trend in human life expectancy. A slow, steady increase in life expectancy (both at birth and remaining life expectancy at middle age) has been underway for decades, driven in part by improvements in approaches to treating age-related disease. To a first approximation, these population-wide effects on the underlying processes of aging achieved over past decades have been unintentional side-effects of progress in medical science. Deliberate targeting of the mechanisms of aging is still a comparatively new idea, and too few people are making use of approaches that may have some benefit to noticeably affect the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiol…
What Do You Think?
comments