MIT Technology Review’s “Old Age is Over” is thought provoking. Or in the case of the technology section – “Old Age is Made Up,” written by Joe Coughlin, head of the MIT Age Lab, the content is just plain provoking. We agree that old age is made up – but in this article, that assertion is underpinned with generalizations that are just, well, also made up. And it shows a lack of understanding about who benefits from technologies that exist in their current form, or that some of those have been upgraded well beyond his generalizations. Consider:
MIT Technology Review’s “Old Age is Over” is thought provoking. Or in the case of the technology section – “Old Age is Made Up,” written by Joe Coughlin, head of the MIT Age Lab, the content is just plain provoking. We agree that old age is made up – but in this article, that assertion is underpinned with generalizations that are just, well, also made up. And it shows a lack of understanding about who benefits from technologies that exist in their current form, or that some of those have been upgraded well beyond his generalizations. Consider:
MIT Technology Review’s “Old Age is Over” is thought provoking. Or in the case of the technology section – “Old Age is Made Up,” written by Joe Coughlin, head of the MIT Age Lab, the content is just plain provoking. We agree that old age is made up – but in this article, that assertion is underpinned with generalizations that are just, well, also made up. And it shows a lack of understanding about who benefits from technologies that exist in their current form, or that some of those have been upgraded well beyond his generalizations. Consider: