One of the impressions received from the literature on electromagnetic stimulation of the brain is that results likely depend strongly on the fine details of the protocol. Current, frequency, duration, and any of the score of other parameters that can be adjusted via a different experimental setup. The use of direct current may have better results to date simply because there are fewer parameters to adjust. Nonetheless, “better results to date” is not a glowing recommendation. The bar as very low, and as pointed out here, the state of clinical trials seen as a whole isn’t all that convincing. You might compare this with a <a href="https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2021/07/reviewing-…
The Human Evidence for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Treatment for Neurodegeneration
One of the impressions received from the literature on electromagnetic stimulation of the brain is that results likely depend strongly on the fine details of the protocol. Current, frequency, duration, and any of the score of other parameters that can be adjusted via a different experimental setup. The use of direct current may have better results to date simply because there are fewer parameters to adjust. Nonetheless, “better results to date” is not a glowing recommendation. The bar as very low, and as pointed out here, the state of clinical trials seen as a whole isn’t all that convincing. You might compare this with a <a href="https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2021/07/reviewing-…